You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

BlueSun comments on The Zeroth Skillset - Less Wrong Discussion

48 Post author: katydee 30 January 2013 12:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (108)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: BlueSun 30 January 2013 09:08:17PM 18 points [-]

I don't mean to be rude but as an FYI:

At times, this evidence can be of critical importance. I can attest that I have personally saved the lives of friends on two occasions thanks to good situational awareness, and have saved myself from serious injury or death many times more.

Lowers my confidence of the post. Almost everyone I know has a story about how they almost died except for a moment of abnormal cunning or pure luck; yet I know few people who have died for reasons that would have been avoidable had they or someone around them been more observant. This suggests to me (since not everyone can be above-average observant or lucky) that in most of those stories, they didn't have as high of a chance of death as they thought they did. It's certainly possible that it's not the case with you, but I'd prefer to either see the specific stories or maybe just use a less extreme example in the post. Or maybe it's just me and no one else is bothered by it.

Comment author: [deleted] 31 January 2013 01:28:57PM *  3 points [-]

There's a problem with that idea.

(I don't know anyone who died because they where hit by a car while crossing a street, but this doesn't mean that looking for cars before crossing a street is pointless.)

Comment author: PaulS 01 February 2013 02:50:30AM 1 point [-]

This case is different in an important way. Most people will go inside during a thunderstorm and check for cars before crossing a street, so avoiding these risks doesn't require an unusual degree of vigilance. katydee is claiming that unusually good situational awareness is frequently a decisive factor in avoiding death or serious injury. If that's true, then we should expect to hear about people dying due to inadequate situational awareness fairly often because most people don't have above average situational awareness.

However, I think this is possibly explained by the fact that people with good situational awareness are far more likely to place themselves in situations were good situational awareness is required.

Comment author: [deleted] 01 February 2013 08:24:07AM 0 points [-]

katydee is claiming that unusually good situational awareness is frequently a decisive factor

I took "good situational awareness" to mean 'a level of SA unusual among readers of this posts', which I guess is a lower standard than 'unusual among the population', e.g. because of this.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 01 February 2013 03:24:37AM 0 points [-]

Special case of situational awareness: I read a discussion among martial arts students of whether they'd ever found their art useful. About half of them said they'd been avoided getting hurt from falling. (Sorry, no cite, but it was on usenet.)

Comment author: gwern 01 February 2013 07:59:47PM 2 points [-]
Comment author: NancyLebovitz 01 February 2013 10:51:50PM 0 points [-]

Thanks very much.

Comment author: shminux 01 February 2013 11:15:56PM *  0 points [-]

Note that falling safely when expecting to be thrown is not the same as landing safely when falling unexpectedly. The latter is probably a special skill, not specifically trained for in martial arts. Here is some discussion:

Breakfalling may even help you get through a training session where you get tossed around a 100 times or more. But, when you slip and fall off the mat your training will most likely not kick in and save you.

Comment author: katydee 01 February 2013 08:55:47AM 0 points [-]

I don't actually think that's thanks to situational awareness but rather from drilling breakfalls a lot.

Comment author: katydee 31 January 2013 12:33:54AM *  5 points [-]

Noted, thanks for the feedback. I do happen to know many (10+) people who died for reasons that would have been avoidable had they or someone around them been more observant, so my impression is that I am correctly calibrated in this respect, but I can see why one might be skeptical.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 31 January 2013 08:03:25AM 10 points [-]

I do happen to know many (10+) people who died for reasons that would have been avoidable had they or someone around them been more observant

Do you have an unusual occupation or something? I know of virtually zero accidental deaths in my circle of friends and acquaintances, so I'm wondering what's going on here.

Comment author: Alicorn 31 January 2013 07:56:48PM 9 points [-]

katydee just knows a bizarre cross-section of the population in full generality. He tells fascinating stories about his weird friends at social gatherings. This doesn't surprise me at all about him in particular, but I don't think we should take it as strong evidence about people in general.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 31 January 2013 11:44:57AM 0 points [-]

There's gotta be someone at the pointy part of the bell curve.

Comment author: jsalvatier 31 January 2013 01:57:40AM 7 points [-]

One way to alleviate skeptical would be to explain why you are unusual in this respect.

Comment author: katydee 01 February 2013 09:04:48AM 4 points [-]

Until posting this, I didn't realize that I was particularly unusual in that respect; I thought having one or two people you know die every year was normal. Does this not happen for most people?

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 01 February 2013 10:59:58AM 3 points [-]

I don't think it started happening until I was past forty, and very few of them died as a result of accidents.

Comment author: katydee 02 February 2013 12:58:23AM 1 point [-]

One other potential confound might be that I know lots of people.

Comment author: Swimmer963 03 April 2013 06:31:39PM 0 points [-]

My maternal grandfather died of a stroke when I was about 12 years old; my paternal grandfather died of cancer when I was 19. Those are the only people I knew personally who have died, and I think those numbers (and causes of death) are fairly typical for young people. I've seen lots more dead people, as a nursing student, including some who died of accidental/preventable causes, but I don't count that as evidence I can generalize from–it's a massively biased sample.

Comment author: BerryPick6 01 February 2013 10:14:31PM 0 points [-]

I know a number of people who have died in the past 3-4 years, but they all happened to be in the army at the time, so I would consider myself unusual in this respect.

Comment author: jsalvatier 01 February 2013 04:50:17PM 0 points [-]

I can only think of one person I know of who died because of a preventable accident. One serious accident comes to mind too. I'm 27, male and in Seattle.

Another approach would be to cite statistics about accident rates. I think at least death statistics from accidents are well recorded.