You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

jsteinhardt comments on What is the best paper explaining the superiority of Bayesianism over frequentism? - Less Wrong Discussion

-1 Post author: Meni_Rosenfeld 01 January 2013 08:58PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (32)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: jsteinhardt 02 January 2013 07:48:02PM 0 points [-]

Yeah, calling PCA frequentist may be a bit of a stretch (although it's certainly not Bayesian). I think ICA (independent components analysis) could legitimately be called frequentist though, as it solves the blind source separation problem under certain independence assumptions (I don't know that much about either of these though, so I could be wrong).