You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Konkvistador comments on Politics Discussion Thread January 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: OrphanWilde 02 January 2013 03:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (334)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 01 February 2013 12:08:47AM *  4 points [-]

Could I ask you to taboo 'deserve' in this context?

A society where extraordinary achievement due to skill or effort isn't matched by appropriately rewards is neither aesthetically pleasing nor fun to live in. We should somewhat try and shape society according to this observation.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 01 February 2013 06:07:18AM *  4 points [-]

neither aesthetically pleasing nor fun to live in

Please be careful not to treat these as one-place functions. Consider the position of a person who is now being told that despite their and their teachers' and parents' best efforts, they simply have not accrued enough "extraordinary achievements" to make (say) medical care for their chronic pain an "appropriate reward" for them. That person may not agree that this makes society more aesthetically pleasing or fun to live in.

Comment author: MugaSofer 01 February 2013 07:30:42PM -2 points [-]

To be clear; you're saying that equal distribution of fun things is less fun? I can see how that'd be.