You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Mestroyer comments on [Link] On the Height of a Field - Less Wrong Discussion

11 Post author: badger 02 January 2013 11:20AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (6)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Mestroyer 04 January 2013 02:19:43AM 0 points [-]

The story of how belief is supposed to work is that for each bit of evidence, you consider its likelihood under all the various hypotheses, then multiplying these likelihoods, you find your final result, and it tells you exactly how confident you should be.

You should add, shouldn't you? Not multiply? Because they're mutually exclusive and exhaustive probabilities? If you multiply, your probability would change depending on how finely you broke down the hypotheses.

Comment author: BlazeOrangeDeer 05 January 2013 10:18:13AM 0 points [-]

I think he means multiply once for each piece of evidence, not each hypothesis.