You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

gwern comments on [Discussion] The Kelly criterion and consequences for decision making under uncertainty - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: Metus 06 January 2013 02:14AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (15)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gwern 06 January 2013 07:46:14PM 1 point [-]

In the long run, we're all dead: in decisions like retirement fund investments the game is short enough that Kelly takes too much risk of short-term losses and you should bet less than Kelly

Which is one of the justifications for pension funds and annuities: by having a much longer timespan than any one retiree, they can make larger Kelly bets, see larger returns on investment, with benefits to either the retirees they are paying or the larger economy. Hanson says that this implies that eventually the economy will be dominated by Kelly players.