You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

AlexMennen comments on Proof of fungibility theorem - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Nisan 12 January 2013 09:26AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (10)
Tags: utility vnm fungibility decision_theory theorem

Comments (10)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: AlexMennen 23 January 2013 04:54:56AM *  0 points [-]

It suffices to find a hyperplane that contains and that supports .

I assume you also want it to support ?

I love this proof, by the way.

Comment author: Nisan 23 January 2013 06:53:15AM 0 points [-]

Ah, you're right. The important thing is that it supports V(P). Thanks.

Comment author: Nisan 23 January 2013 06:45:31AM 0 points [-]

The definition of pv is the next line. Does that not show up for you?

Comment author: AlexMennen 23 January 2013 04:25:24PM *  0 points [-]

Nope. In fact, the one I wrote no longer shows up for me in my comment either. How odd.

Comment author: Nisan 23 January 2013 07:03:26PM 0 points [-]

Does it show up for you in the html source?

Maybe an unescaped character is causing the trouble.

Comment author: AlexMennen 23 January 2013 11:01:18PM 0 points [-]

Problem appears to have been on my end. I can see both now.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit