You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

gwern comments on Evaluating the feasibility of SI's plan - Less Wrong Discussion

25 Post author: JoshuaFox 10 January 2013 08:17AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (186)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gwern 17 January 2013 01:16:14AM *  0 points [-]

You can't get human-level intelligence out of a hand-coded program operating on a passive database of information using only fixed, hand-written algorithms.

You can't? The entire genre of security exploits building a Turing-complete language out of library fragments (libc is a popular target) suggests that a hand-coded program certainly could be exploited, inasmuch as pretty much all programs like libc are hand-coded these days.

I've found Turing-completeness (and hence the possibility of an AI) can lurk in the strangest places.