You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

eurg comments on Farewell Aaron Swartz (1986-2013) - Less Wrong Discussion

75 Post author: Kawoomba 12 January 2013 10:09AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (116)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: eurg 13 January 2013 11:34:46AM *  1 point [-]

It seems I am too incompetent to make myself understood.

Comment author: ahartell 13 January 2013 11:20:40PM *  8 points [-]

I would just like to register my preference that those who retract comments leave the original text in place. In most cases, I believe the retraction itself serves the purposes of retraction pretty well, whereas replacing the text is sort of overkill and detracts from the conversation.

Comment author: [deleted] 14 January 2013 05:53:12PM *  2 points [-]

I generally agree, but I can see the point of making an exception in cases such as disclosure of confidential information, potential basilisks, etc.

Comment author: ahartell 14 January 2013 09:38:02PM 2 points [-]

Agreed.

Comment author: MixedNuts 13 January 2013 12:40:13PM 3 points [-]

treatable mental illness (i.e. if he would just have talked to us)

It's not that simple. Sometimes the illness is perfectly treatable, but in practice you're never able to get treatment before you die, unless one of the people you talk to goes far beyond the call of duty and drops their whole life to help you get treatment and magically divines how and when to help instead of behaving like a bull in a china shop and making everyone else terrified of mentioning depression.

Comment author: MixedNuts 13 January 2013 08:55:12PM 0 points [-]

Oh, for Pete's sake! I understand you were describing a view you don't share, I was just pointing out middles in the dichotomy.