You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

loup-vaillant comments on [Link] Aschwin de Wolf on Chemical Brain Preservation - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: lsparrish 15 January 2013 01:33AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (4)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: loup-vaillant 16 January 2013 11:42:30AM *  1 point [-]

Nevertheless, cryonics is a form of never give up. If this isn't immortalism… However, for strategic reasons, I understand why one might want to stick with the "second shot at life" rationale.

Also, cryonics have to speculate on future technologies: the current ones cannot revive anyone yet. Here I feel a catch22: either you mention specific possibilities, and the dismissal of any one of them could lead to the rejection of cryonics; or you stay vague, and risk being accused of wishful thinking. We may overcome the problem with a well explained disjunctive scenario, though. I hope.