In the Cracked article I first saw this in (can't say if OrphanWilde got it from elsewhere) they admitted that there could be a gender ratio imbalance (they also pointed out that homosexuals exist) but noted that the evidence was being interpreted strictly as evidence for promiscuous males. (And ... whatever the opposite of promiscuous is ... females.)
... whatever the opposite of promiscuous is ...
Chaste. (Traditionally, chastity includes both celibacy outside of marriage and fidelity within.)
From The New York Times:
So how sketchy is the research on human sexual behavior, anyway?