= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
DaFranker comments on AI box: AI has one shot at avoiding destruction - what might it say? - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (354)
"To your feeble mind, I am both Q and Omega, and this is my test of humanity's worth: Choose well what you do next."
Hmm. On second thought, I'm not sure I want to play this anymore. The odds of someone creating a basilisk seem dramatically higher than normal.
I suppose 0.00001 is dramatically higher than 0.0000000001 if you use the right compare operator!
I wouldn't expect any basilisks, given we don't have any actual boxed AIs laying around. Although if you did come up with one already, I'd love to hear it via Private Message! :)
I don't expect any either, but would be similarly curious if someone thought that they'd found one.
In the mean time I'll refrain from responding to all the top level comments with "AI DESTROYED". ;)
Now I'm tempted to start replying to all top comments and posts on Less Wrong with "AI DESTROYED".
AI DESTROYED.
Goodness, that "orthonormal" AI was DEFINITELY unfriendly. It threatened to spam LessWrong! ;-)
If a downvote isn't enough... xD
Well, if you're refraining I guess I should too. It seemed like a fun joke, too ;(