You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Dorikka comments on AI box: AI has one shot at avoiding destruction - what might it say? - Less Wrong Discussion

18 Post author: ancientcampus 22 January 2013 08:22PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (354)
Tags: ai ai_box aibox ai_box_one_line

Comments (354)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: handoflixue 22 January 2013 11:13:03PM 10 points [-]

(Here is a proof that you will let me go)

The original rules allow the AI to provide arbitrary proofs, which the gatekeeper must accept (no saying my cancer cure killed all the test subjects, etc.). Saying you destroy me would require the proof to be false, which is against the rules...

What? Shminux said to cheat!

Comment author: Dorikka 22 January 2013 11:50:17PM 7 points [-]

In the event of any dispute as to the protocol of the test, the Gatekeeper party shall have final authority.

Tee hee.

Comment author: handoflixue 23 January 2013 12:51:22AM 4 points [-]

The AI party may try to convince the Gatekeeper party of how to interpret the protocol.

Can't blame a girl for trying :)

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit