= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Dorikka comments on AI box: AI has one shot at avoiding destruction - what might it say? - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (354)
Eh, I'd go with AI DESTROYED on this one. Considering advice given to you by a potentially hostile superintelligence is a fairly risky move.
Whyever not? I thought that it was an imposed condition that you couldn't type AI DESTROYED until the AI had posted one line, and you've publically precommitted to make AI go boom boom anyways.
The very fact that we've put a human in charge instead of just receiving a single message and then automatically nuking the AI implies that we want there to be a possibility of failure.
I can't imagine an AI more deserving of the honors than one that seems to simply be doing it's best to provide as much useful information before death as possible - it's the only one that's seemed genuinely helpful instead of manipulative, that seems to care more about humanity than escape.
Basically, it's the only one so far that has signaled altruism instead of an attempt to escape.