= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
CronoDAS comments on AI box: AI has one shot at avoiding destruction - what might it say? - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (354)
"I have a proof of the Riemann hypothesis for you. 1) [some math stuff]"
(As a mere human who isn't a PhD mathematician, I can't actually write out something that looks like the beginning of such a proof...)
Can you take the time to copy down the proof before typing <AI DESTROYED>, or does it get the take the time to say something else if you're too preoccupied to respond?
Any action beyond an immediate <AI DESTROYED> will give the AI extra time to talk. This is why I keep nuking the ones that try to do this. Math is a nice proof of intelligence, but says nothing about friendliness.
I would probably hit the Print Screen button, then <AI DESTROYED>. It won't take appreciably longer than just destroying it, and assuming there's not enough space to capture the whole solution, whatever fits on the screen should at least be useful for mathematicians in figuring out a method to make headway on the problem.
True. But some people might be curious enough to listen to the proof before hitting the AI DESTROYED button.
Oh, I'm sure most methods here works on someone. I'm just explaining my own reasoning :)
Don't care. <AI DESTROYED>
Well, you don't have to care, but some people would, and there is a million dollar prize for a correct proof.