You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Kawoomba comments on Thoughts on the January CFAR workshop - Less Wrong Discussion

37 Post author: Qiaochu_Yuan 31 January 2013 10:16AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (73)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Valentine 31 January 2013 06:35:56PM 9 points [-]

Thank you for writing up your thoughts, Qiaochu!

I feel the need to offer one very minor correction:

For example, sympathetic nervous system activity, which governs the fight-or-flight response, is unpleasant, unhealthy, and can prevent you from explicitly modeling other people.

It's actually sympathetic dominance over the parasympathetic side that does this. Both the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems are running all the time, and that's really quite essential. You cannot stand up without the sympathetic system, for instance, nor can you lie down without going into a panic without the parasympathetic side doing its job.

But as long as you replace "activity" with "dominance," I think we're good!

Comment author: Kawoomba 31 January 2013 06:45:34PM 0 points [-]

The statement as he made it is correct, you are not correcting it but making a narrower, also correct, version of his statement.

(I think I need to gzip that sentence.)

Comment author: Valentine 31 January 2013 06:52:22PM 1 point [-]

Really? I'm not so sure. Sympathetic nervous system activity isn't necessarily unpleasant or unhealthy. It's what makes you sweat and have a fast heart rate when exercising. It's very unhealthy not to have that!

But if others interpret Qiaochu's comment in a way that accurately reflects reality, then the fact that it's different than how I read it is not terribly relevant. I was only concerned that some here might come away with a mistaken idea of what the message of that particular CFAR unit was. If there are no such mistakes, then all is good!