You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Error comments on Thoughts on the January CFAR workshop - Less Wrong Discussion

37 Post author: Qiaochu_Yuan 31 January 2013 10:16AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (73)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Qiaochu_Yuan 31 January 2013 10:58:48PM 5 points [-]

Upvoted for writing this before reading the main post. Is that the sort of technique they taught you?

It's related to a point that Julia made in her "Evaluating Advice" unit about contamination of evidence. The idea is to avoid anchoring people to a particular answer when you ask them questions. See also this xkcd comic.

Comment author: Error 05 February 2013 01:13:24PM 0 points [-]

Upvoted out of interest. I try to do this myself, but it never seems to work as well as I expect it should; without an anchor, people frequently just try to guess what I want to hear instead of outputting their own opinion.

Or at least I think they do. It is inherently difficult to verify that sort of thing.