You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Andreas_Giger comments on Singularity Institute is now Machine Intelligence Research Institute - Less Wrong Discussion

32 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 31 January 2013 08:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (99)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Andreas_Giger 31 January 2013 03:34:51PM 1 point [-]

Looks like an attempt to get rid of the negative image associated with the name Singularity Institute. I wonder if it isn't already too late to take PR seriously.

Comment author: gwern 31 January 2013 03:45:41PM *  5 points [-]

Looks like an attempt to get rid of the negative image associated with the name Singularity Institute.

From OP:

When Singularity University (SU) acquired the Singularity Summit from us in December, we also agreed to change the name of our institute to avoid brand confusion between the Singularity Institute and Singularity University.

I'm not sure this name change is a good idea or worth whatever SU offered (or that there was a real brand issue), but there apparently was some other motivation than 'SI now has embarrassing connotations'.

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 31 January 2013 04:17:51PM 14 points [-]

SU and SI kept getting confused with each other all the time.

Comment author: ciphergoth 03 February 2013 08:12:18AM 9 points [-]

Also, when you're trying to explain that there's a gigantic difference between you and another organisation with a similar-sounding name, you can sound a little like the People's Front of Judea.

Comment author: gwern 31 January 2013 05:04:49PM 0 points [-]

By whom? I think the only time I personally saw that happen online was in one British newspaper article.

Comment author: Alex_Altair 31 January 2013 05:34:27PM 22 points [-]

My impression is that anyone who has ever heard of Singularity University doesn't even have it in their hypothesis space that you mean something different when you say Singularity Institute.

Comment author: Kevin 03 February 2013 06:02:24AM 2 points [-]

Yup.

Even when they do have it in their hypothesis space, it still gets mangled. I recently got a follow-up email from someone that still thought I was Singularity University. I had briefly explained to him about how SU had acquired the Singularity Summit from us, and his follow-up email said "now that you have acquired the Singularity Summit, you may be interested in my product..."

Comment author: lukeprog 31 January 2013 08:57:47PM *  12 points [-]

By whom?

Almost every time I spoke to anyone who wasn't deeply familiar with either SU or SI. Including almost every press person.

Comment author: Alicorn 31 January 2013 06:30:40PM 11 points [-]

Rudi Hoffman confused them when I sought a quote from him and mentioned Singinst. And him you'd expect to move in the right circles to know the difference.

Comment author: ciphergoth 03 February 2013 08:10:59AM 3 points [-]

When I stayed with a friend in the Bay Area, I was confused that he said he knew loads of people in SingInst, but kept naming people I'd never heard of - and guess why!

Comment author: David_Gerard 31 January 2013 05:47:43PM *  9 points [-]

There is a real brand issue. I say "Singularity Institute" to people down the pub, the ones who've heard the word go "ah, Kurzweil!" (I was trying to explain this site I like called LessWrong.)

Comment author: Rain 31 January 2013 05:56:06PM 10 points [-]

I told someone at work, and they said, "Oh, like on that Fringe episode [about Kurzweillian uploading]."