= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Jack comments on Politics Discussion Thread February 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (146)
I would say sub- 5% given a low prior for rich, well-governed nations fighting all out wars, Japan being relatively demilitarized still (and war being technically illegal), and the US having a defense commitment there.
On paper, sure. In practice the JSDF is one of the world's top ten military forces by overall measures.
Cite?
Japan ranks #6 in the world for total military expenditures, according to SIPRI 2012.
The JMSDF ranks #4 for tonnage of the world's navies (counting only active, commissioned combat-oriented vessels).
On the other hand China is facing social unrest and as well as problems due to its gender imbalance, so a war that gives people an enemy besides the government to focus their anger as well as killing of excess males might make sense from its point of view.
Sub-5% is very conservative. It's likely sub-2%. Japan is simply too anti-military, and China owns too many US dollars.
Next decade? Extremely low.
What about next 3 decades?
I am going to guess still pretty low although highly militarized intrigue, cyberwar, etc might happen. Or a false start (in either direction).
I also really wonder just how strong the Peace of Europe is.