You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

DaFranker comments on The Fundamental Question - Rationality computer game design - Less Wrong Discussion

41 Post author: Kaj_Sotala 13 February 2013 01:45PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (68)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: DaFranker 13 February 2013 06:09:30PM 1 point [-]

As another possible source of inspiration, Antichamber does really well at teaching players new stuff while being fun. It isn't at all about rationality, but does get players to get rid of specific preconceptions and rapidly train new habits and ways of thinking very effectively.

I think the approach used there could be very useful for introducing new concepts and getting players to start thinking in new ways (though hopefully, with a rationality game featuring Kaj Sotala as Lead Designer, those new ways would also be better ways ;) ).

My main concern is for how effective this would be for transferring the skills taught ingame into the real world (Antichamber certainly hasn't made me learn in-real-life to gel jnyxvat bire n punfz vafgrnq bs gelvat gb whzc npebff vg, whfg gb frr vs n sybbe zngrevnyvmrf. Game spoiler.)

Comment author: MrMind 14 February 2013 02:28:33PM 0 points [-]

Seems extremely cool! Will try as soon as I hit home :)

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 14 February 2013 11:54:58AM 0 points [-]

though hopefully, with a rationality game featuring Kaj Sotala as Lead Designer, those new ways would also be better ways ;)

:-)

Thanks for the pointer, Antichamber looks quite interesting. I just bought a copy, I'll have to try it out.