You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Luke_A_Somers comments on [Link] False memories of fabricated political events - Less Wrong Discussion

17 Post author: gjm 10 February 2013 10:25PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (22)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 11 February 2013 03:17:10PM *  3 points [-]

Shaking the hand of Mahmoud Ahmedinejad shouldn't be embarrassing. I mean, it's politics. You're allowed to shake hands with Hitler if you think it'll help.

Maybe additional context was provided in the study so that doesn't apply?

Also, a second good comparison would have been to make up fake positive stories... Is it a matter of adopting excess credence for your allies, or being more skeptical of your opponents?

Comment author: Jack 11 February 2013 06:24:48PM 3 points [-]

Shaking the hand of Mahmoud Ahmedinejad shouldn't be embarrassing. I mean, it's politics. You're allowed to shake hands with Hitler if you think it'll help.

Maybe additional context was provided in the study so that doesn't apply?

There was a political battle over Obama's (supposed) willingness to meet with Ahmedinejad during the 2008 Presidential race. See this.

Comment author: ChristianKl 11 February 2013 11:27:28PM 2 points [-]

There was a political battle over Obama's (supposed) willingness to meet with Ahmedinejad during the 2008 Presidential race

Wait, how many people remember that event (before clicking on the link?).

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 12 February 2013 11:33:30AM 0 points [-]

That's insane.

Comment author: gjm 13 February 2013 01:25:16AM 0 points [-]

Unlike all the other things politicians have been attacked for?

Comment author: Desrtopa 11 February 2013 04:28:00PM 0 points [-]

I'm speculating here, but my impression is that condemning a politician on the basis of whom they've shook hands with is much more commonly a conservative behavior, and that it may be due to a moral value of purity, such that it's unacceptable for a politician to associate with sufficiently undesirable figures and display anything that might appear to be approval, regardless of whether or not they take actions favoring that figure.

Comment author: roystgnr 11 February 2013 11:43:55PM 3 points [-]

Really? The only thing my brain pattern matched to "embarrassing handshake, political" was the Rumsfeld-Hussein handshake. Google for "hussein handshake" for me claims 15+ million hits, and the front page is all Rumsfeld. If you consider politically-charged-body-language in general, I can recall the US right-wing being upset that Obama bowed to foreign leaders and the US left-wing being upset that Bush Jr. held hands with the Saudi crown prince, but I never had the impression that even this broader category of complaint was common from any part of the political spectrum.

Jack's reference is probably more apropos; this fake story might have been chosen specifically to be vaguely reminiscent of a real story.

Comment author: Desrtopa 12 February 2013 12:40:40AM 0 points [-]

I don't remember the Rumsfeld-Hussein handshake making the rounds, and that apparently was before I mostly stopped paying attention to political news, but my memories of how often this phenomenon occurs may not be representative.

If the hypothesis I proposed in the grandparent were correct regardless, then I imagine the significance behind the Rumsfeld-Hussein picture making the rounds is that the U.S. did back Hussein, so the upset was not that a member of our administration appeared to have associated with a negative figure, but that at one turn we built up a dictator when it seemed politically advantageous, and at another framed him as a monster who was worth taking down even if he didn't pose an active danger.

For all that my own policies tend to lean liberal though, I wouldn't credit the average Democrat with being especially discriminating; it's entirely likely that my above hypothesis is simply wrong.