You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

bogus comments on A confusion about deontology and consequentialism - Less Wrong Discussion

5 [deleted] 11 February 2013 07:19PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (85)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: bogus 12 February 2013 06:04:55PM 0 points [-]

Good point. This also explains why we are so willing to delegate "killing" to external entities, such as job occupations (when the "killing" involves chickens and cattle) and authorities (when we target war enemies, terrorists and the like. Of course this comes with very strict safeguards and due processes.) More recently, we have also started delegating our "killing" to machines such as drones; admittedly, this ignores the truism that drones don't kill people, people kill people.

Maybe if we were less deontological and more consequentialist in our outlook, there would be less of this kind of delegation.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 13 February 2013 07:10:58AM 1 point [-]

Maybe if we were less deontological and more consequentialist in our outlook, there would be less of this kind of delegation.

Depends, a deontological outlook with a maxim that you are responsible for what you have done in your name would be even more effective.