You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Eugine_Nier comments on A confusion about deontology and consequentialism - Less Wrong Discussion

5 [deleted] 11 February 2013 07:19PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (85)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 14 February 2013 07:25:30AM *  1 point [-]

If the error theory were false, I would expect the line dividing different types of preferences would be more stable over time, even if value drift caused moral preferences to change over time.

The line between "truth" and "belief" is also not stable across cultures.

Comment author: TimS 14 February 2013 02:32:16PM 0 points [-]

The line between "true" and "not true" is different in different cultures? I wasn't aware that airplanes don't work in China.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 15 February 2013 04:11:39AM 1 point [-]

I meant in the same sense that you meant the statement about cultures, i.e., if you ask an average member of the culture, you'll get different answers for what is true depending on the culture.

Comment author: TimS 15 February 2013 04:54:06AM 0 points [-]

I was talking about community consensus, not whatever nonsense is being spouted by the man-on-the-street.

As you noted, the belief of the average person is seldom a reliable indicator (our even all that coherent). That's why we don't measure a society's scientific knowledge that way.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 15 February 2013 04:56:36AM 1 point [-]

I was talking about community consensus, not whatever nonsense is being spouted by the man-on-the-street.

Ok, my point still stands.