That's clearly anything but scientific research.
Eh, they're trying multiple ways of preservation to see what works best. We can't test which ones allow the best cyro-recoveries, but I don't see how it's de-facto not science.
I personally consider them shoddy amateurs due to some of the horror stories buried in there, but stating that it's "factually false" that they do ANY research seems an overly strong claim.
Aaron Winborn writes:
Blog post: http://aaronwinborn.com/blogs/aaron/open-source-software-developer-terminal-illness-hopes-opt-out-death
Hacker news discussion: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5211602