Eh, they're trying multiple ways of preservation to see what works best. We can't test which ones allow the best cyro-recoveries, but I don't see how it's de-facto not science.
Science means:
Come up with a testable hypothesis
Design an experiment to test it
Perform the experiment
Statistically evaluate the outcome and determine if it is evidence in favor or against the hypothesis
Communicate the results to the scientific community
Science most definitely does not mean: "Let's try something random today and see what happens".
This is the core difference between scientific research and pre-scientific empiricism.
but stating that it's "factually false" that they do ANY research seems an overly strong claim.
The don't do any scientific research on their human corpses. They did some research on non-human animals in the past, but AFAIK, they didn't publish much.
They did some research on non-human animals in the past, but AFAIK, they didn't publish much.
You seem to concede that you were wrong and they have done some research, even if most of what they do isn't. That was my sole objection, so I think we're on the same page now >.>
Aaron Winborn writes:
Blog post: http://aaronwinborn.com/blogs/aaron/open-source-software-developer-terminal-illness-hopes-opt-out-death
Hacker news discussion: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5211602