You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Leonhart comments on Discussion: Which futures are good enough? - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: WrongBot 24 February 2013 12:06AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (50)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Leonhart 24 February 2013 12:27:23PM 3 points [-]

I fail to see why the shards have to be perfectly isolate, in this scenario. It would seem plausible that the AI could automatically import all the changes made by my best friend in his simulation into mine, and vice versa; and more extensively, include bits and pieces of other "real actions" into my ongoing narrative. Ultimately, everyone in my universe could be "intermittently real" in proportion to which of their owned actions contributed to my utopia, and the rest of their screen time can be done by an AI stand-in that acted consistently with the way I like them to act. (For example, everyone on Twitter could be a real person in another simulation; me following them would start to leak their reality into mine).

This is sounding oddly familiar, but I can't put my finger on why.

Comment author: ikrase 27 February 2013 10:08:52PM 0 points [-]

This is somewhat similar to an idea I have called 'culture goggles' under which all interpersonal interactions go through a translation suite.