= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Luke_A_Somers comments on Unintentional bayesian - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (13)
If you compared probabilities of models based on consistency with the data and their overall plausibility, I'd call that close enough to be on the outskirts of Bayesian - and with the qualifier 'unintentional', which indicates that you're not going to be precisely formally correct, I'd say it fits.