You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

paper-machine comments on Open thread, February 15-28, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: David_Gerard 15 February 2013 11:17PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (345)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 03 March 2013 11:15:23PM *  -1 points [-]

If it should cover the basilisk, why shouldn't it have contributions from the "malcontents".

I didn't make any such statement. Recall, DG was wondering where all this drama about the basilisk came from -- I advised him that it came from two particular users, who are well-known for bringing up this drama in many other forums and have more-or-less dominated the RW talk pages on the subject.

Comment deleted 05 March 2013 07:01:12AM *  [-]
Comment author: [deleted] 05 March 2013 12:36:14PM 0 points [-]

I didn't even say anything remotely close to that, and you know it.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 05 March 2013 07:06:11AM 0 points [-]

Look, if this gets into metafictional causality violation, there's gonna be hell to pay.