You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

CronoDAS comments on Open thread, February 15-28, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: David_Gerard 15 February 2013 11:17PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (345)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CronoDAS 05 March 2013 07:31:25AM 0 points [-]

If you don't mind waiting 18 or so years for your new potential customers...

Comment author: drethelin 05 March 2013 08:15:18AM 0 points [-]

You seem to have completely missed my point. Let me try an analogy: If reliable cars sell better, car manufacturers are incentivized to make their cars more reliable for the cost than their competitors ad infinitum. If a car is infinitely reliable, they never get repeat purchases (clearly they should start upcharging motor oil like printer ink). However, we're so far from perfect reliability that on the margin it still makes sense for any given car developer to try to compete with others to make their cars more reliable.

That doesn't take into account damage to cars or relationships from car accidents. It also doesn't account for polyamory or owning more than one car.

If okcupid's saturation level was 90 percent of the single population, that would be one thing, but there's WAY more marketing to do before that could ever happen and having a good algorithm is basically their entire (theoretical)advantage.

Comment author: CronoDAS 05 March 2013 08:27:05AM 0 points [-]

You seem to have completely missed my point.

Apparently I did. But either way works.