You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Eugine_Nier comments on Great rationality posts by LWers not posted to LW - Less Wrong Discussion

28 Post author: lukeprog 16 February 2013 12:31AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (55)
Tags: links

Comments (55)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 19 February 2013 12:50:24AM 2 points [-]

Then, I began exploring some of the complexities, hoping that you'd expand on them and you instead chose to view my limited engagement in the topic as a sign that doing these kinds of calculations is harder than I realize.

Sorry about that, your examples pattern matched to what someone who wanted to question contemporary practices without actually questioning contemporary ethics would write.

Comment author: Epiphany 19 February 2013 01:12:40AM *  0 points [-]

Thanks, Eugine. I can see in hindsight why I would look like that to you, but before hand, I didn't expect anyone to jump on examples that weren't elaborated upon to the degree you appear to have been expecting. I'm interested in continuing this discussion for reasons unrelated to the comment that originally spurred this off, as I've been thinking a lot lately about how to measure the ethical behavior of humans. I'm still wondering if you're interested in talking about this. Are you?

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 20 February 2013 05:28:34AM 1 point [-]

I'd be interested, although this should possibly be done in a different thread.

Comment author: Epiphany 20 February 2013 11:04:19AM 0 points [-]

Alright. Choose a location.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit