You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Qiaochu_Yuan comments on Tutoring Small Groups of Children (for money) - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: bramflakes 20 February 2013 11:51AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (27)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Qiaochu_Yuan 20 February 2013 09:35:16PM *  7 points [-]

My uninformed opinion is that games should be a good medium for teaching young children. (I would be very interested in hearing opinions about this from people who actually work in education.) I think a surprising amount can be learned by carefully inspecting even a game as simple as Minesweeper. There are various "lemmas" you can prove in Minesweeper about how various configurations uniquely pin down the location of mines or non-mines and I suspect this could be an accessible introduction to mathematical proof (the advantage being that all of the relevant proofs can be done by analyzing a finite number of cases). I haven't actually tried this though.

Comment author: [deleted] 21 February 2013 12:31:40AM 0 points [-]

I agree and would emphasize that deriving concepts from an existing game is preferable to constructing an educational game from scratch. It makes it more engaging and teaches the skill of modelling.

What games do children that age play nowadays?