You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

buybuydandavis comments on "What-the-hell" Cognitive Failure Mode: a Separate Bias or a Combination of Other Biases? - Less Wrong Discussion

18 Post author: shminux 22 February 2013 09:44PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (34)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 23 February 2013 01:41:54PM 3 points [-]

In for a penny, in for a pound.

Comment author: Kindly 23 February 2013 02:52:25PM 5 points [-]

That's just throwing good money after bad.

Comment author: Antisuji 25 February 2013 06:58:31PM 1 point [-]

Sure, but you don't know it's bad. If you're in for a penny, that's evidence (if you trust your own judgement) that it's actually a good investment, and should go in for a pound if you can afford it.

Comment author: [deleted] 26 February 2013 03:22:07AM 1 point [-]

Of course, treating your own belief in a proposition as evidence for that proposition seems like a rather dangerous thing to do.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 27 February 2013 04:43:37AM 1 point [-]

Depends, you don't necessarily want to recompute prepositions every time they come up.

Comment author: Antisuji 26 February 2013 07:35:14AM 1 point [-]

Absolutely! But I think a lot of people implicitly do the equivalent when they try to be or appear consistent at all costs. The reasoning goes something like, "I believe X, therefore I must have a good reason for it and so X must be true!"