You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ThrustVectoring comments on Asteroids and spaceships are kinetic bombs and how to prevent catastrophe - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: Troshen 25 February 2013 11:33PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (30)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ThrustVectoring 26 February 2013 02:56:48AM -2 points [-]

Note that we have made agreements to not weaponize space, so putting nuclear missiles in space would be difficult.

Not to mention that nuclear weapons in space is a cure that may be worse than the disease.

Furthermore, once you get to fractional-c levels of space technology, the defensive problem becomes much more difficult, and city-busting kinetic weapons turn into planet-busting.

Comment author: ChristianKl 26 February 2013 04:26:29AM 2 points [-]

If you have the basics that you need for to fractional-c levels of space technology I think you make a mistake by thinking that "space" is very important. With that kind of technology you can do damage in a lot of ways.

Comment author: ikrase 27 February 2013 09:38:05PM 2 points [-]

If you have fractional-c level tech for objects larger than very small mass accelerator gun rounds, things are entirely different and you can probably just make a damn nuke.