You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Nisan comments on When should you give to multiple charities? - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: jkaufman 27 February 2013 02:56AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (43)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Nisan 27 February 2013 03:42:44AM 12 points [-]

Here's another reason one might want to diversify their altruistic spending, which may or may not be distinct from the reasons in Jeff's post: One's budget may be too small to see significantly diminishing marginal returns, but one may belong to a population of people which as a whole sees diminishing marginal returns. Then one might want to diversify one's spending so that other members of the population diversify their spending. Givewell used such reasoning when it suggested splitting one's donation among Givewell's top-rated charities so that other Givewell donors, following the same principle, would collectively cause Givewell's money-moved metric to reflect this diversity, which would in turn give Givewell better access to more charities.

Comment author: Antisuji 27 February 2013 07:24:17PM 2 points [-]

Agreed – the arguments against diversification don't take into account the fact that individuals' choices will be more highly correlated if they use similar decision processes. In order to make an optimal allocation decision you would need to estimate the total amount of money being donated by people who are using an algorithm similar to yours and decide as though you were allocating the entire amount. Sounds familiar, eh?