You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

PECOS-9 comments on AI prediction case study 1: The original Dartmouth Conference - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 11 March 2013 06:09PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (13)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: PECOS-9 12 March 2013 08:57:01PM 1 point [-]

Here's my attempt to translate these lessons for folks who worry about foom:

(a) Taboo informal discussions of powerful AI and/or implications of such. If you can't discuss it in math terms, it's probably not worth discussing.

I'm not sure how this follows from the previous lesson. Analysing the impact of a new technology seems mostly distinct from the research needed to develop it.

For example, suppose somebody looked at progress in chemistry and declared that soon the dreams of alchemy will be realized and we'd be able to easily synthesize any element we wanted out of any other. I'd call this a similar error to the one made by the Dartmouth group, but I don't think it then follows that we can't discuss what the impacts would be of being able to easily synthesize any element out of any other.

It might be good advice nonetheless, but I don't think it follows from the lesson.