You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Jayson_Virissimo comments on Open Thread, March 1-15, 2013 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Jayson_Virissimo 01 March 2013 12:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (237)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 02 March 2013 09:12:08AM *  3 points [-]

Gregory Clark's work A Farewell to Alms discusses human micro-evolution taking place within the last few centuries, but is highly controversial (or so I hear).

Comment author: CellBioGuy 03 March 2013 04:13:08AM 0 points [-]

To almost anyone who knows much about evolutionary biology its not controvertial but positively laughable.

Comment author: gwern 03 March 2013 04:24:53AM 6 points [-]

Cites?

Comment author: Barry_Cotter 03 March 2013 03:00:29PM 1 point [-]

Yeah, that's like saying you could domesticate foxes in less than a human generation, or have adult lactose tolerance increase from 0% to 99.x% in some populations in under 4,000 years. Does this guy think we're completely credulous?

Comment author: [deleted] 04 March 2013 04:29:10AM 1 point [-]

The traits that I am aware of that show strong evolution all have had thousands of years to be selected for, like lactose tolerance in people descended from herders, resistance to high altitude with a hemoglobin change in Tibet, apparent sexual selection for blue eyes in Europeans and thick hair in East Asians, smaller stature in basically all long-term agriculturalist populations...

-Cellbioguy, elsewhere in thread.

I suspect you've misidentified his contention here; he clearly doesn't seem to think humans haven't evolved within the Holocene.