You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

timtyler comments on You only need faith in two things - Less Wrong Discussion

22 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 10 March 2013 11:45PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (86)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: timtyler 11 March 2013 10:58:27PM *  1 point [-]

I've long claimed to not have faith in anything. I'm certainly don't have "faith" in inductive inference. I don't see why anyone would have "faith" in something which they are uncertain about. The need for lack of certainty about induction has long been understood.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 12 March 2013 01:32:02AM 2 points [-]

I don't have faith in induction. I happen to be the kind of monster who does induction.

But only sometimes. The more toothpaste I have extracted from the tube so far, the more likely it is to be empty.

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 12 March 2013 01:36:03AM 1 point [-]

I've long claimed to not have faith in anything. I'm certainly don't have "faith" in inductive inference. I don't see why anyone would have "faith" in something which they are uncertain about. The need for lack of certainty about induction has long been understood.

Which of these seven models of faith do you have in mind when you use that word (if any)?

Comment author: timtyler 12 March 2013 11:32:23PM 2 points [-]

Bah, philosophy. I essentially mean belief not justified by the evidence.