You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

CellBioGuy comments on [LINK] On the unlikelihood of intelligent life - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: NancyLebovitz 27 March 2013 05:29AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (23)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CellBioGuy 09 May 2013 05:37:53AM 2 points [-]

A random walk away from no brain by a large number of lineages would also give you a constantly increasing upper bound on brain size.

Comment author: timtyler 09 May 2013 11:57:28PM 1 point [-]

That was S. J. Gould's model - in Life's Grandeur. Assuming that a trait like brain size behaves as though it is a neutral trait seems pretty loopy, though. Now we have enormous data centres to explain, the "random drift" model is surely no longer worth entertaining.