You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

sunflowers comments on [Link] Diversity and Academic Open Mindedness - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: GLaDOS 04 April 2013 12:31PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (148)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: sunflowers 05 April 2013 05:29:26AM -1 points [-]

Hitchens had it right in his comments that you point to, and you'd do better to attempt to refute them than ignore them.

And you'd do better to pay attention. You'll notice I never argued against Hitchens. Step back, breathe, and come back to me with some thoughts. Trust me, I've read more of his work than you have.

An exercise for the reader: how did you get from "really bad/stupid views - our judgment of which being flawed - are a negative that should count against a potential faculty member" to theocracy?

Some people will say anything.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 05 April 2013 09:29:46AM 1 point [-]

Breathing just fine. You may have read more of Hitchens than I have. I've likely watched more than you. I guess we could play whose got the biggest swinging Hitchens phallus, but I don't see the point.

An exercise for the reader: how did you get from "really bad/stupid views - our judgment of which being flawed - are a negative that should count against a potential faculty member" to theocracy?

I note that you left out the relevant part of what you originally wrote:

or really, really abhorrent.

Yes, those with ideas you "abhor" shouldn't be hired. In what way do you find this materially different from shunning blasphemers?

Comment author: sunflowers 05 April 2013 03:08:22PM -2 points [-]

Yes, those with ideas you "abhor" shouldn't be hired. In what way do you find this materially different from shunning blasphemers?

Well you notice that I put the two different things side by side in the same sentence to make it really really easy for you. Let's do it again with "theocracy" and "shunning blasphemers." You're shifting.

Here's a hint: at no point have I said that faculty who come out with horrible views should be fired. I also haven't said that people with horrible views should be fined, imprisoned, or banned from publishing. I just don't think they should have an easy time finding a major publisher to air their horrible views or a major newspaper willing to run a holocaust-denying opinion column, a state of affairs which it is left to the owners and editors of such outlets to induce - not the state.

I think being nasty and stupid should cost you. I think we should minimize the nastiness and stupidity and time wasted by such people.