You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

RolfAndreassen comments on Problems in Education - Less Wrong Discussion

65 Post author: ThinkOfTheChildren 08 April 2013 09:29PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (318)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RolfAndreassen 09 April 2013 08:48:45PM 0 points [-]

Consider a test followed by a re-test (which we are trying to predict). To calculate expected score on the re-test you need to apply regression to the mean.

This is only true if you assume there is some component of luck or guesswork to the score. I admit that this may be a good model for the kinds of tests you get in American high schools. However, it is not clear to me that "black people" is the correct population to use for the regression, because by construction you have an untypical member. Why not "high-scoring people" or "all students"?

Perhaps it would be helpful to construct an example using something other than race as the difference between populations, to avoid emotional entanglements?

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 09 April 2013 09:22:12PM 4 points [-]

Try neuroskeptic.

If there is no component of luck or guesswork or something that varies from test to test, then the retest will be exactly the same as the original test, but that's not what we see in pretty much any test. or any measurement of anything.