You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

CarlShulman comments on Taking Charity Seriously: Toby Ord talk on charity effectivess - Less Wrong Discussion

17 Post author: jkaufman 10 April 2013 12:59AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (15)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CarlShulman 10 April 2013 03:32:51AM 1 point [-]

When uploading is first available, I expect it to be expensive, and for the available hardware to be limited in capacity.

So do you expect uploading in the next several decades, or big slowdowns in the improvement of computation per dollar?

Comment author: evand 10 April 2013 03:57:46AM 2 points [-]

I expect most new things to first be available in small quantity at expensive prices and low quality, especially if you're literally talking about putting them to use in the first hours or days after they become possible. In fact, no non-trivial examples that involve any specialized hardware at all come to mind. Am I missing any major ones? Are there major reasons uploading would be different?

Comment author: CarlShulman 10 April 2013 05:16:53AM 2 points [-]

Why expect specialized hardware to be a bottleneck? Most software programs don't require very specialized hardware.

If computation per dollar continues on trend to far surpass minima for brain emulation, then I would expect final bottlenecks to be in brain-scanning or (more likely) understanding the neuroscience, not shaving cycles off the computation of Hodgkin-Huxley.

Comment author: gjm 10 April 2013 01:12:13PM 3 points [-]

I'm pretty sure it was the brain-scanning that evand had in mind when referring to "specialized hardware".

Comment author: evand 10 April 2013 09:53:27PM 0 points [-]

Exactly.