You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

shminux comments on Being Half-Rational About Pascal's Wager is Even Worse - Less Wrong Discussion

18 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 18 April 2013 05:20AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (168)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: shminux 18 April 2013 04:19:35PM 2 points [-]

Eliezer explains it in his other comment (emphasis mine):

Before scanning, I precommit to renouncing, abjuring, and distancing MIRI from the argument in the video if it argues for no probability higher than 1 in 2000 of FAI saving the world, because I myself do not positively engage in long-term projects on the basis of probabilities that low (though I sometimes avoid doing things for dangers that small). There ought to be at least one x-risk effort with a greater probability of saving the world than this - or if not, you ought to make one. If you know yourself for an NPC and that you cannot start such a project yourself, you ought to throw money at anyone launching a new project whose probability of saving the world is not known to be this small.