hairyfigment comments on Probabilistic Löb theorem - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (39)
You mean, because we can always replace the first "a" with some b>a?
This seems like a very cool - and bizarre - result.
Sorry, a bit sloppy with the > and ≥ - since you can always choose a slightly larger "a", it still works out. I've corrected the text.