= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Stuart_Armstrong comments on Probabilistic Löb theorem - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (39)
Nope, it's pretty much done - you can trust your future copies probabilistically, without weakening. However, that would require a P that's both defined and computable - not a trivial task.