I've made a moderately bold decision that I haven't started to regret yet: I'm going to read an undergrad textbook on every subject I claim to be interested in. My main hope for this is mapping out my own ignorance. It's extremely annoying when armchair-experts talk erroneously about subjects from a position of imaginary authority, and I don't wish to be one of those people. It should produce a useful line of demarcation: if I haven't read an undergrad textbook in a subject, I'm definitely unqualified to say what that subject does and does not contain.
If nothing else, it will at least teach me what I'm genuinely interested in, and what I only claim to be interested in.
(Also, yes, I've seen Luke's best-textbooks-on-every-subject post from two years ago.)
I'm going to read an undergrad textbook on every subject I claim to be interested in.
You've inspired me to do the same. :)
This is the public group instrumental rationality diary for May 1-15.
Thanks to cata for starting the Group Rationality Diary posts, and to commenters for participating!
Next diary: May 16-31
Immediate past diary: April 15-30
Rationality Diaries archive