You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Luke_A_Somers comments on Seeking reliable evidence - claim that closing sweatshops leads to child prostitution - Less Wrong Discussion

11 Post author: michaelcurzi 04 May 2013 02:51AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (25)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 04 May 2013 01:12:07PM 12 points [-]

This doesn't just go one way. Labor competition is labor competition - I would expect places where the (adult) sex trade is tolerated would have better conditions in their sweatshops. And so I would expect sweatshop owners to lead moralistic crusades against prostitution.

I've heard of the latter, but I have no info on the former.

Comment author: DanielLC 04 May 2013 07:00:40PM 0 points [-]

Do you mean better conditions in adult sweatshops? I would expect child workers would only be in better conditions if there is competition with their labor.

Then again, if adults can get more pay, they wouldn't need their kids to work. This would also likely lead to worse pay, since parents could afford to care less about that in proportion to conditions.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 04 May 2013 08:14:44PM 0 points [-]

There were a few too many pronouns in that last sentence. Not sure what you mean.

Comment author: DanielLC 04 May 2013 10:13:45PM 0 points [-]

If you give the adults more options as to what jobs they work at, they can make more money. If they can make more money, then they don't need their kids to make as much money. If they don't need their kids to make as much money, they will care more about working conditions than about pay.