You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Locaha comments on Googling is the first step. Consider adding scholarly searches to your arsenal. - Less Wrong Discussion

19 Post author: Tenoke 07 May 2013 01:30PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (45)
Tags: scholarly academic articles papers studies beliefs confirm information scholar search google

Comments (45)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Locaha 08 May 2013 05:00:32PM 1 point [-]

Read only or mainly the abstracts

Feh. Dilettantes read the abstracts. Professionals read the Methods section.

Comment author: Dre 09 May 2013 12:59:42AM 6 points [-]

Professionals read the Methods section.

Ok, but I am not a professional in the vast majority of fields I want to find studies in. I would go so far as to say I'm a dilettante in many of them.

Comment author: RomeoStevens 09 May 2013 05:06:43AM 2 points [-]

even as a dilettante you can often dismiss the conclusions of a paper based on really obvious problems in the methodology (especially in nutrition/exercise/longevity research).

Comment author: Tenoke 09 May 2013 10:25:07AM *  1 point [-]

You often don't have access to the full paper.

Also:

if you are unsure about the quality of the study, then you should also look at the method section to identify it's limitations.3

and

3. If you want to get a better and more accurate view on the topic in question you should read the full paper. The heuristic of mainly focusing on abstracts is cost-effective but it invariably results in a loss of information.

Comment author: Tenoke 08 May 2013 05:08:27PM 2 points [-]

Speed-accuracy trade-off.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit