You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

wedrifid comments on Justifiable Erroneous Scientific Pessimism - Less Wrong Discussion

14 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 08 May 2013 08:37PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (116)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: wedrifid 09 May 2013 12:51:39AM *  -1 points [-]

it has been plausibly argued to me that all the roads to nuclear weapons, including plutonium production from U-238, may have bottlenecked through the presence of significant amounts of Earthly U235 (apparently even the giant heap of unrefined uranium bricks in Chicago Pile 1 was, functionally, empty space with a scattering of U235 dust).

All is such a strong word unless supplemented with qualifiers. I question the plausibility the arguments at supporting that absolute. The route "wait for an extra century or two of particle physics research and spend a few trillion producing the initial seed stock" would still be available.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 09 May 2013 02:11:10AM *  9 points [-]

In context, Fermi was considering something rather more short-term: WW2.

That said, he may not have scoped his statement to such a small scale.

Comment author: wedrifid 09 May 2013 02:15:53AM *  1 point [-]

In context, Fermi was considering something rather more short-term: WW2.

One of many suitable and sufficient qualifiers that could make the arguments plausible.