You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Luke_A_Somers comments on Justifiable Erroneous Scientific Pessimism - Less Wrong Discussion

14 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 08 May 2013 08:37PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (116)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 09 May 2013 02:07:41AM 2 points [-]

It was pessimistic in the sense that under his estimate the sun was steadily cooling and so we'd all freeze to death long before the real sun will present us any trouble.

Comment author: Jack 09 May 2013 03:13:16AM 1 point [-]

Did he give an estimate of when we'd all freeze to death?

Comment author: Plasmon 09 May 2013 05:22:34AM 5 points [-]

He estimated the sun was no more than 20 million years old, and presumably did not expect it to last for more than a few tens of millions of years more.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 09 May 2013 05:10:21AM 2 points [-]

Not that I know of. Gravitational collapse is a really lousy, short-term source of energy, which is why he gave such a shorter estimate. Still on the scale of millions of years, I think.