You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Jiro comments on How should negative externalities be handled? (Warning: politics) - Less Wrong Discussion

-5 Post author: nigerweiss 08 May 2013 09:40PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (131)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jiro 09 May 2013 03:37:05PM 0 points [-]

One major problem is the practical effect of adding new taxes. Adding a tax creates a group of people who benefit from the tax, either a part of government that gets to decide how to spend the tax money, a recipient of tax money, or both, and it is in that group's interest to let the size and purpose of the tax slip beyond its original intention. A carbon tax might be a good idea if it is revenue neutral, but there's no way you can make one that is guaranteed to stay revenue neutral.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 11 May 2013 10:58:24PM 0 points [-]

A carbon tax might be a good idea if it is revenue neutral, but there's no way you can make one that is guaranteed to stay revenue neutral.

You can't guarantee anything because of political will. But take in taxes, count total, divide by eligible recipients, electronic transfer money. It's not complicated to make it revenue neutral if you have the will to do it.