You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

OrphanWilde comments on How should negative externalities be handled? (Warning: politics) - Less Wrong Discussion

-5 Post author: nigerweiss 08 May 2013 09:40PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (131)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: OrphanWilde 09 May 2013 07:03:52PM *  4 points [-]

Sweatshops pay higher than average wages. There are alternatives, the alternatives are worse.

Sweatshops don't represent a deviation to the worse. They represent a deviation for the better. We look at them and see how bad people have things and get upset - and completely ignore how much worse things would be without them. You say these people are invisible, but the really invisible people are the people who the West never interacts with at all, and are significantly worse off for it. People who complain about sweatshops tick me off, because they never offer a real solution; their solutions are always "fair trade", which is always about protectionist policies that ensure these people never get a fighting chance at those scraps from the West's table.

</rant>

Yes. My comments were addressing specifically Western concerns, because that is where fubarobfusco's comment seemed to be coming from.